State what a reviewer should decide from the supplied material, such as whether an ordinary date line remains separate from a decorative heading. This is a hypothetical example, not a claimed test result. Avoid asking someone to approve an entire product when only one view is available. Add one sentence explaining what would make the material insufficient, so requesting a clearer view remains a useful outcome rather than an automatic demand for another generated candidate.
A proposed checklist for assembling material to discuss a character-art draft: name one question, identify the actual source, choose a relevant view, separate observations from future checks, and record a bounded next step. Each item includes practical notes, not claims of completed tests or approval. I am associated with ASCII Art Generator. An optional ascii art maker can prepare candidates, but is not the evidence being reviewed. Core tools are free; optional AI features can require an account and paid credits. AI assisted this original checklist.